A person who purchases and uses any gasoline or special fuel, on which the Minnesota gasoline or special fuel tax has been paid, for the operation of a power take-off unit (PTO) or auxiliary engine fueled from the same supply tank as the highway vehicle, may obtain a refund of the tax paid on the fuel consumed by the PTO, as calculated under subpart 4 or 5. The taxpayer must file a claim for refund as outlined in subpart 2. Refunds may not be obtained for fuel consumed during idling time.
All claims for refund must:
be filed within one year from the fuel purchase date, with the postmark date being the filing date; and
be supported by records maintained under subpart 3.
Only one refund claim per each one-month period is allowed. If corrections to any refund claim are necessary, an amended refund claim must be filed.
The claimant must maintain the following records:
Each sales ticket or invoice must be machine numbered serially with numbers of at least three digits and have on it the:
If bulk fuel is purchased, the customer must keep dispersal records that indicate the date of disbursement, the number of gallons withdrawn, and a description of the vehicle in which the fuel was delivered.
Fuel logs must be maintained and must be made available to the Department of Revenue upon demand.
In lieu of original sales tickets or invoices, the department will accept alternative records, including computer-generated listings or other electronically generated listings, as long as they clearly provide the necessary information.
The percentages in this subpart are allowed for the refund of tax paid on gasoline or special fuel used in operating a PTO or auxiliary engine, when records as outlined in subpart 3 are maintained. The amounts are specified as a percentage of the total taxable fuel used by the vehicle; in other words, the fuel actually placed into the supply tank of the motor vehicle on which the PTO is attached. The refund will be equal to the tax actually paid on that percentage of the fuel.
The percentages are:
Concrete pumping truck | 75% |
Corn shellers | 70% |
Sewer cleaning or jet vactor | 35% |
Ready mixed concrete truck | 30% |
Sanitation and garbage trucks, including transfer trailers, rolloff trucks, recycling trucks, and container delivery trucks; septic pumpers | 25% |
Self-loaders and chip hauling vans (timber or logging) | 20% |
Line truck with digger or aerial lift (utility trucks) | 20% |
Semi-wreckers | 15% |
Bulk feed truck | 15% |
Service truck with jack hammer, drill, or crane | 15% |
Oil and water well service trucks (pump hoists and drill rigs) | 15% |
Dump trailer trucks and dump trucks | 15% |
Seeder trucks | 15% |
Tank trucks | 15% |
Tank transport | 15% |
Fertilizer spreaders or bulk fertilizer tender trucks | 15% |
Feed grinders | 15% |
Truck with hydraulic winch | 15% |
Carpet cleaning van | 10% |
Wreckers | 10% |
Hot asphalt distribution trucks | 10% |
Car carrier with hydraulic winch | 10% |
All other qualifying vehicles | 10% |
A claimant may choose to forego taking the straight percentage under subpart 4 if accurate records and sufficient documentation are provided to the commissioner to substantiate the refund claim.
A claim for refund may include alternative information provided from a hubometer (hub meter) or similar device that accurately measures the road use mileage of a vehicle. This information is needed in order to separate the road miles from the PTO miles. The information provided must be sufficient to determine the actual number of miles for which the PTO is engaged while the vehicle is stationary. The refund will then be based on the actual amount of fuel used to run the PTO. This provision is only applicable if the claimant chooses not to take the straight percentage available under subpart 4, and if the claimant provides the commissioner with the documentation needed to substantiate the claim.
A claimant with a vehicle with technology that enables the claimant to generate accurate statements containing detailed information regarding the amount of fuel used to propel the PTO may submit those statements to the commissioner with a refund claim. In such a case, the applicable general percentage under subpart 4 will not be used and the technology-generated information shall be used by the commissioner to independently calculate the refund.
A claimant may use an alternative method, other than those listed in item A or B, to calculate the refund, provided that the claimant furnishes the commissioner with the proposed formula to be used, or other manner of substantiation, and receives written prior approval from the commissioner to use the alternate method.
If the commissioner determines that the optional information provided under subpart 5 is not sufficient, the applicable general percentage under subpart 4 shall be used to calculate the refund.
22 SR 2156; L 2005 c 151 art 1 s 114; 49 SR 532
December 3, 2024
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes